High Court Says California Governor Overstepped in Seizing Energy Contracts
By John
Woolfolk, San Jose Mercury News, Calif. -- June 4
Jun. 4--Gov. Gray Davis overstepped his
authority last year when he seized an estimated $200 million worth of energy contracts
to keep electricity flowing to the state at the height of the power crisis, the
U.S. Supreme Court decided Monday.
The court let stand an appellate court ruling
that the governor's emergency powers did not grant him the authority to take
over the Duke Energy contracts, a decision that means the state would be forced
to rely on federal regulators for help if a similar situation occurred, said
Sandra Michioku, spokeswoman for Attorney General Bill Lockyer.
The decision also raises the possibility that
Californians may end up paying even more to a power company at a time when
state and federal officials are finding growing evidence that energy merchants
manipulated the state's market. Davis has asked federal regulators to order
$8.9 billion in refunds from Duke and other power companies.
But whether the court decision means
California owes contract holder Duke more money for the electricity contracts,
which expired at the end of last year, remains to be determined.
"We're obviously disappointed," Michioku
said. "Californians are now left to trust the federal government to
protect them from blackouts in an energy crisis, rather than have the governor
act to ensure that electricity is delivered to the state." At issue are
electric power contracts Duke signed with Pacific Gas & Electric and
Southern California Edison in 2000 just before the state's power crisis.
As the crisis peaked in early 2001, the
utilities ran into a cash crunch because their rates were frozen by law at a
level that fell short of their skyrocketing costs for wholesale power.
With the utilities unable to pay for billions
of dollars in power and energy companies threatening to cut off sales, the
state stepped in to buy power. Davis declared a state of emergency and seized
control of the utilities' power contracts, arguing it was necessary to avoid
blackouts and to secure energy at reasonable cost.
Duke sued, contending that the contracts
became void when the utilities could not pay their bills and claimed that the
company had the right to resell the power at market rates that were then many
times higher.
The contracts varied in price from
approximately $60 to $130 per megawatt-hour, Duke spokesman Patrick Mullen
said. When the state seized them in February 2001, average daily market prices
were over $300 per megawatt-hour.
"Under federal law, those contracts
should have been liquidated at market rates," Mullen said, calling the
state seizure an "unfair taking of our assets." After the 9th U.S.
Circuit Court of Appeals agreed in a 2-1 ruling, the state appealed to the
Supreme Court, arguing that states are constitutionally immune to such suits.
Lockyer argued that the appellate ruling
"has hamstrung the ability of this governor and future governors to
respond to a crisis." But in its decision, the appellate court said Duke
was entitled to the contracts as "collateral" for breach of contract
under Federal Energy Regulatory Commission rules.
"Gov. Davis' commandeering orders
deprived wholesale suppliers of their FERC-required collateral for past
transactions, and hence of their `assurance of payment,' " the appellate
court said.
Whether the state now owes Duke a higher
price for the contract power will be decided in a separate claim before a
Sacramento County Superior Court judge. A hearing is scheduled June 21.
Mullen said the company has not determined
how much it believes the contracts were worth and said the court would decide
their value.
The state argues that regardless of whether
the contract seizure was legal, the company has already been paid what they
were worth.
Duke, which is based in Charlotte, N.C., has
not figured in the recent wave of scandals washing over the energy industry in
the wake of the Enron bankruptcy, and is not among the power companies that the
state has sued alleging unfair business practices.
But Duke, a major energy producer in
California, has been under investigation and has come under criticism,
particularly over its admission that it tried to sell PG&E power for a
record $3,880 per megawatt-hour, about 100 times today's rate.
The company, however, never received payment
for the 5,000 megawatts sold at that price.
The Associated Press contributed to this
report.
-----
To see more of the San Jose Mercury News, or
to subscribe to the newspaper, go to http://www.bayarea.com
(c) 2002, San Jose Mercury News, Calif. Distributed by Knight Ridder/Tribune Business News. DUK, PCG, SCE.Q, ENRNQ,