Electric Deregulation May Bring Higher Rates in Texas
By R.A.
Dyer, Fort Worth Star-Telegram, Texas -- June 7
Despite promises of cheaper electricity,
Metroplex residents could soon pay more under electric deregulation than they
paid 18 months ago under the old regulated system, according to an analysis by
Fort Worth and other cities.
The higher rates would result from a proposed
TXU rate increase that, if approved, could take effect by next month. The
increase, tied to higher natural gas prices, would erase any benefit from a 6
percent rate reduction included in the Texas deregulation law, the analysis
shows.
People outside the Metroplex will also pay
more under electric deregulation if the Public Utility Commission approves
increases for other utilities, according to similar reviews.
"This is not what the Legislature
intended," said Kristen Doyle, an attorney for Fort Worth, Dallas and
other cities served by TXU, Central Power and Light and other utilities.
"If that (TXU) increase gets approved, it will cost more for electricity
under competition than it would before deregulation."
Although not disputing the underlying
figures, a TXU spokesman called the cities' analysis unfair. He also said that
deregulation allows customers to shop for cheaper electricity if they don't
like what TXU is charging.
The dispute raises questions about a central
promise of deregulation: Will it result in cheaper electricity for Texans? It
also addresses what has become an increasingly hot topic as the gubernatorial
race enters into the summer months.
In TV advertising, Democratic challenger Tony
Sanchez has linked Republican Gov. Rick Perry with an electric "price
hike". The Perry camp calls the advertisements inaccurate and cites PUC
figures showing that major utility rates dropped when the law took effect.
Neither side disputes that rates dropped Jan.
1, the first day of deregulation, when compared with utility rates at the end
of last year. But a precipitous drop in the cost of natural gas -- not a 6
percent rate drop mandated by the law -- explains most of that decline.
The state's major utilities can charge no
more than those Jan. 1 rates for the next three years, although they can
request adjustments to reflect higher fuel costs. To control for such changes
in fuel costs, the cities compared the proposed rate increase to
pre-deregulation rates during a period with similar natural gas prices.
Under the company's proposed increase, TXU
figures natural gas at a $3.63 per million British thermal units. In January
2001, TXU figured natural gas prices at $3.83.
After deregulation -- under the proposed rate
increase and with gas prices slightly cheaper -- TXU customers would pay 8.7
cents per kilowatt hour, the analysis shows. Before deregulation -- and during
that period with slightly more expensive natural gas prices -- TXU customers
paid about 8.5 cents per kilowatt hour, according to the analysis.
That's about an $87 electric bill for the
average Metroplex homeowner under the proposed rate increase. About 18 months
ago, the average homeowner paid about $85 per electric bill. The
post-deregulation bill would be higher, despite the 6 percent rate reduction
that took effect Jan. 1, according to the analysis.
An administrative law judge recently approved
the proposed rate increase, which now goes to the full PUC for consideration.
If approved, Metroplex customers could be paying the higher rates next month, a
company spokesman said.
TXU's Chris Schein questioned the fairness of
the cities' analysis, saying the commission now uses different methods when
calculating fuel charges.
"We're absolutely comparing apples to
oranges here," Schein said. "And from those comparisons, the cities
are using misleading information designed to confuse everyone."
For instance, the commission no longer allows
TXU or other major utilities to recoup any of their past losses associated with
fuel costs. Schein said that TXU has been undercharging for fuel for several
months and that the company will never recoup those losses.
"That is a million dollars statewide
that customers will not have to pay," he said.
TXU also uses more natural gas than during
that previous period, and the company's proposed increase fairly approximates
its current fuel expenditures, he said.
The cities agree that the commission uses new
methods to determine fuel costs -- but they argue in a challenge of TXU's
proposed rate increase that those methods are unfair.
Although TXU no longer charges customers for
past fuel losses, for instance, neither must it lower rates if its fuel costs
drop and it overcharges customers. Under the old system, the utilities could
recover only their exact fuel costs -- no more, no less.
Likewise, the commission previously
considered a broad variety of fuel-related components -- including expenditures
for natural gas, lignite, coal and nuclear generation -- when setting rates.
Under deregulation, the commission focuses on a single component: natural gas
futures.
Doyle, the attorney representing Fort Worth
and other municipal governments, said the new method hurts consumers and
undermines electric deregulation. As a result, homeowners could pay more under
deregulation.
"Natural gas prices are the most
volatile component of fuel factors," Doyle said. "And if you just tie
in natural gas prices, you are passing 100 percent of the risk to the customer.
It's like buying 100 percent of your energy on the spot market, every single
day."
A PUC spokeswoman said the commission closely
followed the 1999 deregulation law when it adopted rules on judging utility
requests for fuel-related rate adjustments. She said that the commission must
now follow those rules, and that those rules do not leave much room for
interpretation.
"There is a good deal of math to it ...
to determine the calculation was done correctly," PUC spokeswoman Carrie
Collier said.
Doyle also argued that although Metroplex
residents would have paid less under the regulated rates -- even those rates
were too high.
That's because the PUC allowed higher rates
for several years before deregulation so utilities could recoup the cost of
various big-ticket investments, officials say. Ratepayers paid TXU at least
$887 million extra from 1998 to 2001, according to documents on file at the
PUC.
TXU spokesman Schein said the PUC would have
authorized utilities to charge for those investments anyway -- with or without
deregulation -- and that consumers may have saved interest payments by paying
for them earlier.
But given the previously higher rates to
cover investments and the new method of calculating fuel costs, Doyle said
consumers could end up paying more under deregulation.
"Rates are already overinflated,"
Doyle said. "The commission let (utilities) overearn to pay down those
(investment) costs -- that was acknowledged. Then the commission gave
ratepayers a 6 percent reduction as a safe harbor as they went into a
deregulated market. I don't know when the goal changed, but now they're
flooding that safe harbor."
-----
To see more of the Fort Worth Star-Telegram,
or to subscribe to the newspaper, go to http://www.dfw.com
(c) 2002, Fort Worth Star-Telegram, Texas. Distributed by Knight Ridder/Tribune Business News. TXU,